Antibacterial Activity and Silico Molecular Prediction of Snake Venoms (Bitis arietans and Naja nigricollis) Against Some Clinical Bacterial Isolates

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56919/usci.1122.019

Keywords:

scanning electron microscopy, Naja nigricollis, Molecular Docking, minimum inhibitory concentration, Bitis arietans

Abstract

Over the years, the venoms of various animals have been found to include a variety of antibacterial compounds. One of the greatest challenges of public health is multidrug-resistant bacteria strains which always call for new and potent antibacterial agent to help curb these strains of bacteria. In the quest to source antibacterial agents active against multidrug-resistant bacteria, this research work was designed to investigate the antibacterial activity of crude venoms of B. arietans and N. nigricollis against gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial strains. Current studies revealed that Puff adder (Bitis arietans) of the Viperidae family crude venom showed distinct antibacterial activity against the clinical isolates and more efficient than (Naja nigricollis) of Elapidae family as well as tested antibiotics available today. The methods include antibacterial activity screening assay, followed by scanning electron microscope and molecular docking techniques. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for puff adder crude venom was 8 g/ml against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC. However, the MIC for common antibiotics (ampicillin, penicillin, chloramphenicol, and tetracycline) was in the range of 8-64 g/ml. The venom of the puff adder (Bitis arietans) exhibited antibacterial action against gram-positive bacteria through the cell wall and membrane damage, according to the results of scanning electron microscopy. The molecular docking established a mechanism of action between venom protein and the ligands in the cell wall of gram-positive bacteria. The result identified high docking energy scores and interacting amino acid residue. Puff adder (Bitis arietans) of the Viperidae family crude venom demonstrates a workable source for investigating antimicrobial prototypes for upcoming novel antibiotics against clinical microorganisms with medication resistance.

References

Blair, J. M., Webber, M. A., Baylay, A. J., Ogbolu, D. O., and Piddock, L. J. (2015). Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol. 13(1):42-51. [Crossref]

https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3380

Burbrink and Crother (2011). Extinction, ecological opportunity, and the origins of global snake diversity. Evolution 66(1):163-78. [Crossref]

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01437.x

CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019). Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States. [CDC]

CLSI (2014). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Twenty-Fourth Informational Supplement. CLSI Document M100-S24. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne. [CLSI]

Colovos, C. and Yeates, T. O. (1993). Verification of protein structures: patterns of nonbonded atomic interactions. Protein Sci. 2, 1511-1519. [Crossref]

https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560020916

Ferreira, B. L., Santos, D. O., Dos Santos, A. L., Rodrigues, C. R., de Freitas, C. C., and Cabral, L. M. (2011). Comparative Analysis of Viperidae Venoms Antibacterial Profile: a short communication for proteomics. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med.; 2011:960267. [Crossref] https://doi.org/10.1093/ecam/nen052

Gold, B. S., Dart, R. C., and Barish, R. A. (2002). Bites of venomous snakes. N. Engl. J. Med. 347(5):347-356. [Crossref]

https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra013477

Ononamadu A., Chimaobi J. and Aminu I., (2021). ''Molecular docking and prediction of ADME/drug-likeness properties of potentially active antidiabetic compounds isolated from aqueous-methanol extracts of Gymnema Sylvestre and Combretum micranthum'' BioTechnologia vol. 102 (1) C pp. 85-99 C. [Crossref] https://doi.org/10.5114/bta.2021.103765

Perumal Samy, R., Pachiappan, A., Gopalakrishnakone, P. et al., (2006) In vitro antimicrobial activity of natural toxins and animal venoms tested against Burkholderia pseudomallei. BMC Infect Dis 6, 100. [Crossref]

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-6-100

Perumal Samy, R., Stiles, B. G., Franco, O. L., Sethi, G., and Lim, L. H. K. (2017). Animal venoms as antimicrobial agents. Biochem. Pharmacol. 134:127-138. [Crossref]

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2017.03.005

Phua, C. S., Vejayan, J., Ambu, S., Ponnudurai, G., and Gorajana, A. (2012). Purification and Antibacterial Activities of an L-Amino Acid Oxidase from King Cobra (Ophiophagus hannah) venom. J. Venom Anim. Toxins Incl. Trop. Dis. 18: 198-207. [Crossref]

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-91992012000200010

San, T. M., Vejayan, J., Shanmugan, K., and Ibrahim, H. (2010). Screening antimicrobial activity of venoms from snakes commonly found in Malaysia. J Appl Sci 10: 2328-2332. [Crossref]

https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2010.2328.2332

Tasoulis, T., and Isbister, G. K. (2017). A Review and Database of Snake Venom Proteomes. Toxins 9(9):290. [Crossref]

https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins9090290

Warrell, D.A. (2010) Snake Bite. The Lancet, 375, 77-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61754-2

[Crossref]

Warrell, D.A. (2019). Venomous Bites, Stings, and Poisoning: An Update. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America 33, 17-38. [Crossref]

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2018.10.001

Watcharin R., Alisa S., , Jureerut D., and Isaya J., (2019). ''Antibacterial Activity of Snake Venoms Against Bacterial Clinical Isolates". Pharm. Sci. Asia 2019; 46 (2), 80-87. [Crossref]

https://doi.org/10.29090/psa.2019.02.018.0003

Downloads

Published

2022-09-30

How to Cite

Sulaimon O., M., Binta Garba Kurfi, Magaji, S., & Olayele Gbenga Awujoola. (2022). Antibacterial Activity and Silico Molecular Prediction of Snake Venoms (Bitis arietans and Naja nigricollis) Against Some Clinical Bacterial Isolates. UMYU Scientifica, 1(1), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.56919/usci.1122.019