Evaluating the Lethal Dose (LD50) and Mutagenic Effects of Sodium Azide on Germination and Quality Traits in Two Varieties of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56919/usci.2434.006

Keywords:

Agronomic traits, Beefsteak, San Marzano, Lethal Dosage, Mutagenic

Abstract

Study’s Excerpt

  • Lethal dose (LD50) of sodium azide for two distinct tomato varieties, Beefsteak and San Marzano was quantified.
  • The optimal mutagen doses that can be leveraged for enhancing quality traits in tomatoes is determined.
  • Sodium azide has potential to improve crop resistance and productivity in tomato breeding programs.

Full Abstract

Sodium azide is a chemical mutagen that has been used to produce resistance in various susceptible crops to improve their yield and quality traits against harmful pathogens.  The lethal dose and mutagenic effects of sodium azide on the germination percentage of two varieties of tomatoes (Beefsteak and San Marzano) were investigated with the aim of optimizing a suitable mutagen concentration with variability that could be exploited in the improvement of quality traits in Tomato plants.  This study was carried out in the Green House at the Department of Biotechnology, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Ndufu-Alike, Ebonyi State (AE-FUNAI).  The two varieties of tomato seeds were collected locally as fresh seeds from the taxonomic department and were treated with sodium azide at different concentrations of 0.0%, 0.2%, 0.4%, and 0.6% w/v.  The seed was sown and monitored for 30 days with everyday documentation of germination percentage, survival percentage, and lethal dose.  Statistical analysis using significant difference (LSD) at 95% probability level was employed to analyze the effects.  The results obtained from this study show that there is a steady decrease in germination and survival percentage with increased concentration of sodium azide in both varieties of tomatoes when compared with the control.  The lethal dose (LD50) was determined upon germination and survival of the tomato varieties.  The highest LD50 was calculated by linear regression to be 0.950 for the beefsteak variety, which was significantly higher than 0.794 for the san marzano variety at 50% germination was recorded under treatment 0.6% NaN3.  These concentrations are therefore considered as the LD50 values.  Sodium azide via mutation at low concentrations improves some important quality traits of tomatoes.

References

Abdullah, F.S., Salik, N.K., Ambreen, S. and Justina, J.T. (2010). Effect of packing materials on storage of TOMATO. Mycopath Journal, 8(2): 85-89

Adamu, A. K., and Aliyu, H. (2007). Morphological effects of sodium azide on tomato (Lycopersiconesculentum Mill). Science World Journal, 2(4), 9-12. https://doi.org/10.4314/swj.v2i4.51755.

Adamu, A.K., Clung, S.S. and Abubakar, S. (2004). Effects of ionizing radiation (gamma-rays) on Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). Nigeria Journal of Experimental and Applied Biology, 5(2): 185-193.

Adeosun, C. A., Elem, K. A., and Eze, C. D. (2020). Mutagenic effects of sodium azide on the survival and morphological characters of tomato varieties. Nigerian Journal of Biotechnology, 37, 55-62. https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/njb.v37i1.6.

Bala, B.U., Yelwa, S.I., Hassan, F.S., and Babangida, S.M. (2019). Mutagenic effect of sodium azide (NaN3) on morphological characteristics on two varieties of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum mill). Bayero Journal of pure and applied sciences. 11(1):50. http://dx.doi:10.4314/bajopas.v11i1.8S.

Chaudhary, J., Alisha, A., Bhatt, V., Chandanshive, S., Kumar, N., Mir, Z., Ashwini, K., Satish, K., Yadav, S.M., Humira, S. and Rupesh, D. (2019). Mutation breeding in tomato: Advances, applicability and challenges. Plants. 8(5): 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8050128.

Chen, R., Kang, S., Hao, X., Li, F., Du, T., Qiu, R., and Chen, J. (2015).Variations in tomato yield and quality in relation to soil properties and evapotranspiration under greenhouse condition. Scientia Hort., 197(3):318-328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.047

Cherie, E. (2010). The Complete Guide to Growing Tomatoes: A Complete Step-by-Step Guide Including Heirloom Tomatoes (Back-to-Basics Gardening). Second edition, Barnes & noble press new York city U,S. pp. 22-24. https://www.barnes&noble.com

Eze, J.J. and Dambo, A. (2015). Mutagenic effects of sodium azide on the Quality of maize seeds. Journal of Advanced laboratory research in biology,6(3):76-82.https://e-journal.sospublication.co.in.

Gichner, T. and Veleminsky, J. (1977). The very low mutagenic activity of sodium azide in Arabidopsis thaliana. BiologiaPlantarum, 19:153-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02926758.

Gruszka, D., Szarejko, I. and Maluszynski, M. (2012). Plant mutation breeding and biotechnology. Second edition. Chapter; Sodium azide as amutagen. CABI international, Wallingford,UK.pp. 159-166. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2105.8560.

Gunasekaran, A. and Pavadai P. (2015). Studies on induced physical and chemical mutagenesis in groundnut(Arachishypogea).Int.Lett.Nat.Sci35:25.https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILNS.35.25.

Hartz, T. (2020). Processing Tomato Production in California. UC Vegetable Research and Information Center, 24(1), 31-41. https://doi.org/10.3733/ucanr.7228.

Hasegawa, H. and Inoue, M. (2020). Effects of sodium azide on seedling injury and chlorophyll mutation in rice. Japan Journal of Breeding, 30, 301-308. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs1951.30.301.

Ilbas, A. I., Eroglu, Y. and Eroglu, H. E. (2005). Effects of the application of different concentrations of NaN3 for different times on the morphological and cytogenetic characteristics of barley (Hordeumvulgare L.) seedlings. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 47, 1101-1106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2005.00137.x

Kharkwal, M.C and Shu, Q.Y. (2009). The role of induced mutations in world food security: In: Induced Plant Mutations in the Genomics EraShu, Q.Y. (Ed.), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. pp. 33-38. https://www.fao.org/docrep/012/i0956e/1095e.

Liamngee, S.M., Ogah, J.J., Amagu, K.T., Kwon-Ndung, E.H., Iorkor, D. and Tervershima, J.E. (2017). Mutagenic action of sodium azide on germination and emergence in landraces of Phaseolus vulgaris (L.) on the Jos Plateau agro-ecological zone. J Agric Vet Sci 10(2): 64-70. https://doi.org/10.9790/2380-1002016470.

Omosun, G., Ekundayo, E.O., Okoro, I.A., Ojimelukwe, P.C., Egbucha, K.C. and Akanwa, F.E .(2021). Preliminary study on the effect of different concentrations of EMS on two pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp.) accessions. Afri. Sci. 22(2):1595-6881. http://www.niseb.org/afs

Owais, W. M. and Kleinhofs, A. (1988). Metabolic activation of the mutagen azide in biological systems. Mutation Research, 197, 313-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(88)90101-7.

Raina, A., Kursheed, S. and Khan, S. (2018) .Optimization of mutagen doses for gamma rays and sodium azide in Cowpea genotypes. Trends Biosci 11(13): 2386-2389. https://doi.org/trends2386inbiosciences-2389,201811(13),2018.

Sadiq, M. F. and Owais, W. M. (2000). Mutagenicity of sodium azide and its metabolite azidoalanine in Drosophila melanogaster. Mutation Research, 469, 253-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1383-5718(00)00079-6.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-16

How to Cite

Ibeh, A. G., Udechukwu, C. D., & Ofoegbu, J. N. G. (2024). Evaluating the Lethal Dose (LD50) and Mutagenic Effects of Sodium Azide on Germination and Quality Traits in Two Varieties of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). UMYU Scientifica, 3(4), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.56919/usci.2434.006