Analysis of Household Fuelwood Consumption as Cooking Energy and the Implications on the Environment: A Case of Vandeikya Local Government Area of Benue State, Nigeria

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56919/usci.1122.031

Keywords:

environment, implications, energy, cooking, households, Analysis

Abstract

This study analysed households fuelwood consumption as domestic cooking energy source and the implications on the environment in Vandeikya Local Government Area of Benue State, Nigeria. A total of two hundred and forty (240) respondents were selected using multistage sampling procedure to elicit information for the study. Primary data for the study was garnered with the use of structured questionnaires and interview schedule and was analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Findings from the study revealed that the majority (81%) of the household heads were males with a mean age of 40 years. 83% of the respondents were married and had at least one form of education with secondary education having the highest share of 49%. The average household size of the respondents was 7 persons with majority (52%) of them taken to farming as their main occupation The mean monthly income of the respondents was N43,150. Majority (79%) of the respondents use firewood as their main fuel source for cooking which they obtained mostly at no cost from the forests (44%) and their farmlands (37%). The average cost price of a bundle of firewood stood at N200 in the study area while that of kerosene is N750/litre in the study area.  Charcoal is sold at N2500/50kg bag (N50/kg), electricity, N61.5/kwh and gas, N780/kg. The average consumption level of fuelwood by respondents was estimated at 3 bundles daily. The result reveals that lack of cheaper energy alternatives (88%), large family sizes (84%), easy availability (77%) were the main reasons given by the respondents for fuelwood consumption over other sources. The perceived environmental effects of fuelwood utilization were; deforestation (75%), global warming (57%), Indoor and outdoor pollution (53%), and violent windstorms (46%), among others. Marital status, educational status, household size, monthly income and cost of Gas significantly influenced the consumption of fuelwood by households. The study recommends use of alternative and clean energy sources should be encouraged and the corresponding alternative energy technologies made available and affordable to residents to reduce the overreliance of households on the use of traditional energy carriers such as firewood and charcoal, thereby reducing their negative impact on health and environmental degradation. Tree planting campaigns should be embarked upon by both residents and relevant authorities to replenish the depleted forest resources and for their sustainability.

References

Abebaw, D. (2007). Household determinants of firewood choice in Urban Ethiopia: a case study of Jimma Town. The Journal of Developing Areas, 41: 117-126 [Crossref]

https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2008.0009

Adedayo A.G, (2005). Gender roles in forest resources utilization and its impact on rural environment in Kwara State, Nigeria. In: Environmental sustainability and conservation in Nigeria.Okoko E, Adekunle VAJ, Adeduntan SA (eds). Environmental conservation research team, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria. pp 291-295.

Adedayo A.G., Sale FA, Kekeh O (2008). Rural household wood energy utilization pattern and its impact on deforestation in Akoko South West LGA Ondo State, Nigeria. In: JC Onyekwelu, VAJ Adekunle, DO Oke (eds.). Proceedings of the first national conference of the Forests and Forest Products Society. 16th - 18th April, 2008 pp 159-164.

Aide, M., (2012). National Stakeholders Forum on Formulation Strategy for Rural Industrialization and Development Through Renewable Energy Technology Nicon Hilton Abuja. 14th and 15th November, 2002.

Bailis, R., Ezzati, M & Kammen, D.M. (2007). Health and greenhouse gas impacts of biomass and fossil fuel energy futures in Africa. School of Forestry and Environmental Studies. New Haven: Vale University.

Bhatt BP, Sachan M.S (2004). Firewood consumption along an altitudinal gradient in mountain villages of India. Biomass and Bioenergy 27(1):69-75. [Crossref]

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2003.10.004

Buba, A., Musa, A., Idi A., Adamu, J and Yusuf, I.U. (2017). Socio - Economic Determinants of Households Fuel Consumption in Nigeria." International Journal of Research - Granthaalayah, 5(10), 348-360. [Crossref]

https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v5.i10.2017.2312

Diaz, S,Fargione, J, Chapin FS III, and Tillman, D.(2006). Biodiversity loss threatens human-well-being. Plos boil 4(8): e277. [Crossref]

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040277

Dogo Simeon, B. N. Wendock, B. Friday & M. Madaka (2019). Fuelwood Exploitation and its Impacts on Residents of Kakau Daji Village, Chikun Local Government Area, Kaduna State, Nigeria. Communication in Physical Sciences 2019, 4(1): 39-48

Ebe F.E (2014). Socio-Economic Factors Influencing the Use of Fuelwood in Urban Areas of Enugu State, Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM) e-ISSN: 2278-487X, p-ISSN: 2319-7668. Volume 16, Issue 11.Ver. II (Nov. 2014), PP 147-151 [Crossref]

https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-16112147151

Ewah J.O (2014). Exploitation of carbon energy and the integrity of protected rain forest areas in Nigeria. International journal humanities and social science, 4 (6): 206-215

Gatersleben, B., Steg, L & Vlek, C (2002). Measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behaviour. Environment and Behaviour, 34, 335-362. [Crossref] https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502034003004

Hoffman, H., Uckert, G., Reif, C., Muller, K. and Sieber, S (2015). Traditional biomass energy consumption and the potential introduction of firewood efficient stoves: Insight from western Tanzania. Regional Environmental Change. 15 (7) 1191-1201. [Crossref]

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0738-1

Ibrahim Sufiyan, Muhammad K.D, Umar Musa U (2021). Appraisal of Per Capita Consumption of Charcoal and Firewood As an Alternative Energy Sources for Domestic Usage In Keffi Nasarawa State Nigeria. Journal of Wastes and Biomass Management, 3(1): 22-26. [Crossref]

https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/nvst/v8/2675E

IFAD. (2016). Assessment of Rural Poverty-Eastern and Southern Africa fip://fip.fao.or,g/docrep/tao -/010/ai02le/ai02le00.pdf

Ikurekong, E. E., Esin; J.O and Mba,A. C. (2009).Rural fuel wood Exploitation in Mbo Local Government Area. A Nigeria Coastal Settlement, Ethiopia Journal of Environmental Studies and Management, 2(3):44-55. [Crossref]

https://doi.org/10.4314/ejesm.v2i3.48265

International Energy Agency (IEA, 2002). Electricity in India. Paris,OECD.

International Energy Agency (IEA, 2010). Energy poverty: How to make modern energy access universal? World Energy Outlook, Paris.

Isma'il, M., Maiwada, A., Bashir, A., Musa, I. J., Adamu, G and Babajo, H.(2014). Comparative Analysis of Fuelwood Utilization In-and-Aroud Ikara Local Government Area of Kaduna State, Nigeria. Global Journal of Research and Review. ISSN 2393-8854 www.gjrr.org. 1(3) pp 125-135

Kowasari,R., & Zerriffi, H. (2011). Three dimensional energy profiles: A conceptual framework for assessing household energy use. Energy Policy, 39: 7505-7517. [Crossref]

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.030

Maina, Y. B., Kyari, B. G. and Maina, M. B. (2019) Socio-Economic Determinants of Household Dirty Energy Use in Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Economics, Environment and Social Sciences 5(1&2):64-71.

Muller, C & Yan, H. (2016). Household fuel use in developing countries: review of theory and evidence. ffhalshs-01290714.3.

Musango, J. (2014). Household electricity access and consumption behaviour in an urban environment: The case of Gauteng in South Africa. Energy for Sustainable Development, 23: 305-316. [Crossref] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2014.06.003

Obayelu, A.E., Lawal, I.B & Omotuyole, I.A. 2017. Comparative analysis of access, and preferences of rural and urban households for cooking energy and the determinants in Nigeria: A case of Ogun State. Agricultura Tropica et Subtropica, 50 (1):45-53. [Crossref]

https://doi.org/10.1515/ats-2017-0006

Popoola L, 2000. Practice of environmental management and forestry production. An invited paper presented at the international enabling conference. The guinea check initiative environment forum. September, 2000 Abuja, Nigeria.

Putz F, E, Redford, K.H, Robinson, J.G,fimber, R. and blate G. M(2001). Biodiversity conservation in the context of tropical forest management. 80 pages. The world bank, Washington, dc.ss

Puzzolo, E., Pope, D., Stanistreet, D., Rehfuess, E.A & Bruce, N.G. (2016). Clean fuels for resource-poor settings: A systematic review of barriers and enablers to adoption and sustained use. Environmental Research, 146: 218-234. [Crossref]

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2016.01.002

Sassen M, Sheil D & Giller KE (2015) Fuelwood collection and its impacts on a protected tropical mountain forest in Uganda. Forest Ecology and Management 354: 56⎼67. [Crossref]

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.06.037

Schlag, N & Zuzarte, F. (2008). Market barriers to clean cooking fuels in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review of literature. Sweden: Stockholm Environment Institute.

Sloan, S., and Sayer, J.A. (2015). Forest Resources Assessment of 2015 shows positive global trends but forest loss and degradation persist in poor tropical countries. Forest Ecology and Management 352, 134-145 [Crossref]

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.06.013

Sogbon, O., Olugbamila, O. B., Akinrinmade O., Oloketuyi, J (2017). Implications of Fuelwood Demand on Sustainable Forest Conservation of The Sub-Sahara Africa. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research IJSTR©2017 www.ijstr.org Volume 6, Issue 04, April 2017 ISSN 2277-8616

Sovacool, B.K. and I.M. Drupady. (2011). Summoning earth and fire: the energy development implications of Grameen Shakti (GS) in Bangladesh. Energy, 36: 4445-4459. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.077

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.077

Tee, NT, anchor, D.U. and asue,J. 2009: Evaluation of Fuelwood Consumption and Implications on the Environment: a case study of Makurdi area in Benue state 19:1041-1048. University of agriculture, Makurdi, Nigeria.

Tsue, P.T, Gidado, E.H and Abah, D. (2016). Cooking Energy Demand among Rural Farmers in Gboko Local Government Area, Benue State, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Economics, Extension & Science (JAEES) 2(1).71-80.

Uhunamure, S. E., Nethengwe, N. S and Musyoki, Agnes (2017). Driving Forces for Fuelwood Use in Households in the Thulamela Municipality, South Africa. Journal of Energy in Southern Africa • Vol 28 No 1. [Crossref]

https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3051/2017/v28i1a1635

Ullah SM Asik and Tani M (2017). Fuelwood Consumption and its Impact on Forests in the Teknaf Peninsula on the Southern Coast of Bangladesh. American Journal of Environmental Sciences 2017, 13 (3): 225-232. [Crossref]

https://doi.org/10.3844/ajessp.2017.225.232

Umar, O. U., Nura, S., Dahiru, M.M and Isa, M. A (2016). Effects of Fuel Wood Exploitation On The Environment: A Case Study Of Nasarawa Local Government Area, Nasarawa State, Nigeria. Dutse Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences 2(1) June 2016 pp 195 - 201

United Concerned Scientists (USC) (2011). The root of the problems what is driving tropical deforestation today.

Vandeikya Local Government Information Office (2018).

World Bank. (2003). Household fuel use in developing countries: a multicounty study. ESMAP Technical Paper, no. 042. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

World Health Organization (WHO, 2016). Burning opportunity: clean household energy for health, sustainable development, and wellbeing of women and children. World Health Organization.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-30

How to Cite

vihi, vihi S., Momoh Yakubu Onaivi, Markwin Francis Malel, Chomini Emilia Akunna, Onuwa Godfrey, Selzing, Peter Musa, & Ochelle Blessing. (2022). Analysis of Household Fuelwood Consumption as Cooking Energy and the Implications on the Environment: A Case of Vandeikya Local Government Area of Benue State, Nigeria. UMYU Scientifica, 1(1), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.56919/usci.1122.031