Anaerobic Digestion of Maize Husk in Co-Digestion with Goat and Cow Dung for Enhanced Biogas Production
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56919/usci.2431.019Keywords:
Biogas production, Anaerobic Co-digestion, Maize -husk, Cow dung and Goat dung, Retention time, Methane contentAbstract
In recent investigations, Anaerobic co-digestion has been superior to traditional anaerobic digestion (AD). The advantages of employing co-substrates for improved bioenergy generation and solids reduction have drawn researchers to investigate the co-digestion technology and understand the impact of multiple substrates on digester performance. This study aimed to generate biogas by co-digestion of maize husk with cow and goat dung as substrates, isolate the bacteria involved in the process, and assess the quantity and makeup of the biogas generated by the substrates. The substrates were fed to mini-digesters fabricated in the laboratory using 1L bottles for 49 days’ retention time. It assessed the production potential of the substrates for biogas yield in mono-digestion and co-digestion. The average biogas yield (cm3) and methane content (%) in the D1, D2, D3, D4, D5, and D6 were 9135 (58%), 8660 (71%), 9820 (69%), 6545 (65%), 5915 (48%) and 1965 (21%) respectively. The highest gas yield was observed in digesters with co-digestion of the substrates (D1 and D2) than the mono-digestion of the GD and CD by 35.2% and 24.4%, respectively, with an improvement in methane content. The process was carried out in a mesophilic condition and a pH range of 6.8-8.2. The study's findings showed that the most frequently isolated and identified bacteria were Klebsiella pneumoniae and Bacillus species, indicating that these species are essential to the microbial activities involved in biogas production. The investigation additionally showed that maize husk in co-digestion with cow dung and goat dung had great potential for generating and producing large quantities of biogas within 49 days’ retention time.
References
Ahmadu T. O. (2009). Comparative Performance of Cow Dung and Chicken Droppings for Biogas Production, M.Sc Thesis Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria.
AOAC. Methods of Analysis of Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 16th Edn Washington, DC, AOAC, (2010)
Asiagwu, A.K.; H. I. Owamah and V.O. Illoh (2012). Kinetic and Thermodynamic Models for the Removal of Aminophenol (Dye) from Aqueous Solutions using Groundnut (Arachis Hypogea) Shells as the Biomass. Advances in Applied Sciences Research, 3(4): 2257-2265.
Baki AS (2004) Isolation and identification of microbes associated with biogas production at different retention time using cow dung. M.Sc dissertation, Usman Danfodio University Sokoto, Nigeria.
Cheesbrough M (2006) District Laboratory Practice in Tropical Countries Part 2, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press. . https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511543470
El-Mashad, H.M. and Zhang, R. (2010). Biogas Production from Co-digestion of Dairy Manure and Food Waste. Bioresource Technology, 101:4021-4028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.027
Haider, M.R.; Y.S. Zeshan; R.N. Malik and C. Visvanathan (2015). Effect of mixing ratio of food waste and rice husk co-digestion and substrate to inoculum ratio on biogas production. Bioresource Technology 190: 451– 457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.02.105
Nabuuma, B., & Okure, M. A. E. (2005). Field-Based Assessment of Biogas, Technology: The Case of Uganda. In Proceedings from the International Conference on Advances in Engineering and Technology (pp. 481–487). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045312-5/50052-2
Okafor N. (1998). An integrated Bio-system for the disposal of Cassava Wastes. In Proceedings: Internet conference on Integrated Bio-systems in Zero Emissions Applications.
Onthong, U. and Juntarachat, N. (2017). Evaluation of biogas production potential from raw and processed agricultural wastes, Energy Procedia, 138, pp 205-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.151
Owamah, H.I. and Izinyon, O.C. (2015a). Development of simple-to-apply biogas kinetic models for the Co-digestion of Food Waste and Maize Husk. Bioresource Technology 194: 83–90.
Oyeleke and Manga SB (2008). Essential Laboratory Practical in microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.136
Sambo (2015). Biogas production from co-digestion of selected Agricultural wastes in Nigeria. Standard Scientific Research and Essays 3(10): 302-308. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v3.i11.2015.2909
Sara, M .E. F and Mahdi A. S. S. (2016): Physicochemical Properties of Balanites aegyptiaca (Laloub) Seed Oil. Journal of Biological Science, 2 (4):1-10.
Ukpai. P.A. and Nnabuchi, M.N. (2012). Comparative study of biogas production from cowdung, cow pea and cassava peeling using 45 litre biogas digester. Advances in Applied Science Research, 3, pp 1864-1869.
Voegeli, Y., Lohri, C.R., Gallardo, A., Diener, S. and Zurbruegg, C. (2014). Anaerobic digestion of biowaste on developed countries, Practical information and case studies. Duebendroff: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
Zhang (2015). Influence of initial pH on thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure and maize stalk. Waste Management, 35,119-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.004
Zhang, L., Loh, K.C. and Zhang, J. (2018). Activated carbon enhanced anaerobic digestion of food waste lab-scale and pilot scale operation. Waste Management, 75, pp 270-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.02.020
Zhang, Y. and Banks, C.J. (2013). Impact of different particle size distributions on anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid wastes. Waste Management, 33, pp 297-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.09.024
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 UMYU Scientifica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
&
