Quantifying Carbon Sequestration in Woody Trees of Makurdi Zoological Garden, Benue State, Nigeria: A Non-Destructive Approach

Authors

  • Adoyi Michael Paul Department of Biological Sciences, Federal University, Kashere, P.M.B. 0182 Gombe, Gombe State, Nigeria. https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2253-6087
  • John Ubelejit Alfred Department of Horticulture and Landscape Technology, Akanu Ibiam Federal Polytechnic, Unwana, PMB 1007 Afikpo, Ebonyi State, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56919/usci.2432.024

Keywords:

Above-Ground, Below-Ground, Biomass, Carbon, Sequestration, Trees

Abstract

Study’s Excerpt/Novelty

  • This study comprehensively assesses carbon sequestration capacities across twenty-seven woody tree species in Makurdi Zoological Garden using non-destructive measurement techniques.
  • Utilizing tools such as girt measuring tape, haga altimeter, and pantropical allometric equations, the study quantified both above-ground and below-ground biomass and carbon content, revealing significant correlations and distinct clusters among the parameters.
  • These findings underscore the critical role of regular measurement of carbon storage in woody trees to accurately estimate their contribution to reducing atmospheric CO2 levels and addressing climate change.

Full Abstract

Carbon emissions and reflection are some of the most significant and urgent environmental problems in the world today due to climate change, and because of their ability to sequester Carbon, trees significantly reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.  This study used a non-destructive method to evaluate the capacity of twenty-seven species of woody trees from 16 distinct families to sequester Carbon in Makurdi Zoological Garden in Benue State.  A girt measuring tape was used to measure DBH (diameter at breast heights) at 1.3 meters above ground, a haga altimeter was utilized in measuring the Height of trees and the estimation of AGB (above-ground biomass) was performed using the pantropical allometric equation.  The results indicated that the twenty-seven tree species under study yielded 1512.7 tons/ha and 302.5 tons/ha of AGB and BGB, respectively.  Additionally, 756.6 and 151.29 tons/ha for AGC and BGC were recorded, respectively.  Poisson regression analysis shows significant deviance among the parameters studied (p ≤ 0.005), Pearson correlation analysis shows strong positive correlations (1.000) between total Carbon sequestered and total ground Carbon, total ground Carbon, total below-ground Biomass and total above-ground Biomass, among others, and cluster analysis revealed 8 distinct clusters.  This investigation showed how much carbon woody trees sequester and highlighted the importance of measuring the amount of Carbon stored by woody trees regularly, as this allows one to calculate the amount of CO2 released into the atmosphere.

Author Biography

John Ubelejit Alfred, Department of Horticulture and Landscape Technology, Akanu Ibiam Federal Polytechnic, Unwana, PMB 1007 Afikpo, Ebonyi State, Nigeria

DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY,  ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR

References

Ajayi, E. (2021). Assessment of Carbon Sequestration Potential of some Selected Urban Tree Species. BioRxiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.19.457022

Andrianantenaina, A.N., Rathgeber, C.B.K., Pérez-de-Lis, G., Cuny, H. and Ruelle, J. (2019). Quantifying intra-annual dynamics of carbon sequestration in the forming wood: a novel histologic approach. Annals of Forest Science, 76: 62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-019-0846-7

Björklund, J., Seftigen, K., Schweingruber, F., Fonti, P., von Arx, G., Bryukhanova, M.V., Cuny, H.E., Carrer, M., Castagneri, D. and Frank, D.C. (2017). Cell size and wall dimensions drive distinct variability of early wood and latewood density in northern hemisphere conifers. New Phytol, 216:728–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14639

Bouriaud, O., Teodosiu, M., Kirdyanov, A.V. and Wirth, C. (2015). Influence of wood density in tree-ring-based annual productivity assessments and its errors in Norway spruce. Biogeosciences, 12:6205–6217. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-6205-2015

Carugati L., Gatto B., Rastelli E., Lo M.M., Coral C., Greco S. and Danovaro R. (2018). Impact of mangrove forests degradation on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1-11, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31683-0.

Chave, J., Andalo, C., Brown, S., Cairns, M. A., Chambers, J. Q., Eamus, D., Fölster, H., Fromard, F., Higuchi, N., Kira, T., Lescure, J.P., Nelson, B. W., Ogawa, H., Puig, H., Riéra, B. andYamakura, T. (2005). Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forest. Oecologia, 145: 87-99.

Cuny, H.E., Rathgeber, C.B.K., Frank, D., Fonti, P. and Fournier, M. (2014). Kinetics of tracheid development explain conifer tree-ring structure. New Phytol, 203:1231–1241. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12871

Dijkxhoorn, Y., van Galen, M., Barungi, J., Okiira, J., Gema, J. and Janssen, V. (2019). The vegetables and fruit sector in Uganda: Competitiveness, investment and trade options. Wageningen Economic Research.

Eneji, I.S., Obinna, O and Azua, E.T. (2014). Sequestration and Carbon Storage Potential of Tropical Forest Reserve and Tree Species Located Within Benue State of Nigeria. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 2, 157-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/gep.2014.22022

FAO (2020). Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020 – Key findings. Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca8753en

Halim M.A.R., Soeprobowati T.R. and Hadiyanto H. (2023). Ecological Assessment of the Role of Mangrove Trees in Carbon Sequestration and Biodiversity in Karimunjawa National Park Indonesia. Geography, Environment, Sustainability, 3(16), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2022-2565

Iveren, B.C. and Johnson, S.A.O. (2018). Mapping tree above-ground biomass and Carbon in Omo Forest Reserve Nigeria using Landsat 8 OLI data. Southern Forests: A Journal of Forest Science. https://doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2018.1463150

Janiola, M. D. C. and Marin, R. A. (2016). Carbon sequestration potential of fruit tree plantations in Southern Philippines. J Biodivers Environ Sci, 8 (5), 164-174.

Kruize, H., van der Vliet, N., Staatsen, B., Bell, R., Chiabai, A., Muiños, G., Higgins, S., Quiroga, S., Martinez-Juarez, P., Aberg Yngwe, M., Tsichlas, F., Karnaki, P., Lima, M.L., García de Jalón, S., Khan, M., Morris, G. and Stegeman, I. (2019). Urban Green Space: Creating a Triple Win for Environmental Sustainability, Health, and Health Equity through Behavior Change. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 16 (22):4403.

Kumar, P., Tokas, J., Kumar, N., Lal, M. and Singal, H. R. (2018). Climate change consequences and its impact on agriculture and food security. International Journal of chemical studies, 6 (6), 124-133.

Le Quéré, C., Andrew, R. M., Friedlingstein, P., Sitch, S., Hauck, J., Pongratz, J. and Arneth, A. (2018). Global carbon budget 2018. Earth System Science Data, 10 (4), 2141-2194.

Lundqvist, S.O., Seifert, S., Grahn, T., Olsson, L., García-Gil, M.R., Karlsson, B. and Seifert, T. (2018). Age and weather effects on between and within ring variations of number, width and coarseness of tracheids and radial growth of young Norway spruce. Eur J For Res 137:719–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-018-1136-x

Makinde, E. O., Womiloju,A. A. and Ogundeko,M. O.(2017). The geospatial modelling of carbon sequestration in Oluwa Forest, Ondo State. Nigeria, European Journal of Remote Sensing, 50:1, 397-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2017.1341819

Nabais, C., Hansen, J.K., David-Schwartz, R., Klisz, M., López, R. and Rozenberg, P. (2018). The effect of climate on wood density: what provenance trials tell us? For EcolManag 408:148–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.10.040

Ojekunle, O.O., Oyebamiji, N.A., Olaniyi, A.A., Majolagbe, M.O. and Akinrotimi, J.A. (2023). Assessing the Carbon Sequestration Potentials of Indigenous Trees among Academic Parks in Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manage. 27 (9) 2021-2027. https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v27i9.19

Patil, P. and Kumar, A. K. (2017). Biological carbon sequestration through fruit crops (perennial crops-natural "sponges" for absorbing carbon dioxide from atmosphere). Plant Archives, 17 (2), 1041–1046.

Popkin, G. (2015). Weighing the world’s trees. Nature, 523:20 – 22

Rathgeber, C.B.K. (2017). Conifer tree-ring density inter-annual variability-anatomical, physiological and environmental determinants. New Phytol 216:621–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14763

Syahid L.N., Sakti A.D., Virtriana R., Wikantika K., Windupranata W., Tsuyuki S., Caraka R.E. and Pribadi R. (2020). Determining Optimal Location for Mangrove Planting Using Remote Sensing and Climate Model Projection in Southeast Asia. Remote Sensing, 12(22), 3734. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12223734.

Thornton, P.K., Whitbread, A., Baedeker, T., Cairns, J., Claessens, L., Baethgen, W., Bunn, C., Friedmann, M., Giller, K.E., Herrero, M., Howden, M., Kilcline, K., Nangia, V., Ramirez-Villegas, J., Kumar, S., West, P.C. and Keating, B. (2018). A framework for priority-setting in climate smart agriculture research. Agricultural Systems, 167; 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.09.009

Tom-Dery, D., Akomanyi, G., Korese, J. K. and Issifu, H. (2015). The contribution of mango agroecosystems to carbon sequestration in Northern Ghana.

Vasagadekar, P.R., Gargate, A.V., Patil, Y.Y. and Raut, P.D. (2023). Carbon sequestration potential of trees from urban green spaces of Kolhapur city, Maharashtra, India. Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, 11 (3): 22-32. https://doi.org/10.2478/environ-2023-0014

Wambede, M.N., Akello, G., Lugumira, J.S., Barasa, B., Amwonya, D. and Mulabbi, A. (2022). Carbon Sequestration of Fruit Trees under Contrasting Management Regimes. Indonesian Journal of Geography, 54 (3), 420-427. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijg.70203

Downloads

Published

2024-06-28

How to Cite

Paul, A. M., & Alfred, J. U. (2024). Quantifying Carbon Sequestration in Woody Trees of Makurdi Zoological Garden, Benue State, Nigeria: A Non-Destructive Approach. UMYU Scientifica, 3(2), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.56919/usci.2432.024